Why ColdFusion 2021 Might Be Your Off-Ramp from Adobe ColdFusion
Back in the mid-90s, a little company named Allaire built a dynasty within the web development community by introducing ColdFusion. Delivered as an affordable, easy-to-implement application server, ColdFusion included a familiar tag-based programming language (CFML) that enabled data-driven web applications. The roots of Webapper’s expertise in web application development go back to those early days (version 1.6!). Over twenty years later, with ColdFusion being in the hands of Adobe for fifteen of them, Adobe has announced the release of ColdFusion 2021 (2.5 years since the last major release), which may delight some, but will most likely drive many loyal users away. As painful as it can be, we present the case for why we think ColdFusion 2021 might be the time for you consider an off-ramp from Adobe ColdFusion (hint: Webapper is perfectly positioned to help).
Adobe ColdFusion 2021 Licensing Costs
At the top of the list of reasons to shelve ColdFusion are the licensing costs. Adobe has clearly decided to milk the top of the market – government and enterprise customers who are heavily embedded in ColdFusion – by maintaining an antiquated licensing model. We laugh when we hear these 90s pricing models mentioned in the realm of modern cloud computing. They just don’t fit.
Adobe ColdFusion 2021 is sold in two forms: the Standard Edition is $2,499 for two cores, and the Enterprise Edition is $9,499 for eight cores.
ColdFusion Standard 2021 provides a limited feature set for applications with moderate traffic. ColdFusion Enterprise 2021 is designed for higher traffic applications in clustered environments and with need for enterprise grade features and integrations. An additional disadvantage of Adobe’s cores-based licensing model is that it’s per-server (regardless of whether virtual or physical), which further adds to the costs. You can’t, for example, buy one Enterprise license and run a cluster of four 2-core server instances. License-included cloud offerings such as the official ColdFusion image in the AWS Marketplace can actually be substantially more expensive than the pricing options noted here (and the AWS Marketplace offering has historically been Enterprise-only, with no option to use Standard edition).
ColdFusion 2021 Isn’t True Cloud Computing
Cloud computing design patterns, such as microservices and serverless architectures for systems and software, reflect a critical trend with profound implications for enterprise IT. Taking a monolithic architecture to microservices represents a fundamental shift in how IT approaches software development. By its very nature, Adobe ColdFusion is a monolithic architecture, with a large-footprint and centralized application runtime. As such, putting ColdFusion in the cloud isn’t true cloud computing. Yes, it resides in a cloud environment, but it’s not leveraging the best options of the cloud. ColdFusion 2021 represents Adobe’s first attempt at adapting the product to the cloud, including ‘transitional’ features that begin to leverage cloud architecture. The question becomes whether it’s worth continuing expensive investment in the monolith or transitioning to a native cloud platform
Note, the same can be said of Lucee, the F/OSS CFML engine, with which Webapper has deep and broad expertise. There are some key differences, however, between Lucee and ACF as monolith application servers. First and foremost, Lucee is the same price for 8 or 16 or 32 cores, or 8 or 16 or 32 servers — $0. (P.S.: the Lucee Association does need your membership if you’re running significant systems on Lucee!). More importantly, the legacy monolith design problem is being aggressively addressed by the Lucee development team, including plans for serverless/headless deployment in the next major Lucee release).
The Shrinking CFML Talent Pool
One of the challenges of using older technologies is the shrinking number of developers. We receive resumes from veteran CFML developers who have nowhere to go. It’s a shrinking job market, and although 20 years of experience sounds tempting, the salaries are commensurate. It’s hard for us to say it, but we are ultra-selective, and it’s hard to find versatile, experienced, affordable ColdFusion talent. Any hiring manager who has contrasted the CFML-guru and Python-guru talent pools will immediately understand what we’re saying here. We find the upper end of the Python developer salary range to be near the floor of the ColdFusion range. And Python’s a growing pool – it is the second most popular programming language in 2021.