Comments on: Axosoft OnTime to Subversion (SVN) hooks via TortoiseSVN http://www.webapper.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/26/axosoft-ontime-to-subversion-svn-hooks-via-tortoisesvn/ Web Application Engineers Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:24:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/ hourly 1 By: Nat Papovich http://www.webapper.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/26/axosoft-ontime-to-subversion-svn-hooks-via-tortoisesvn/comment-page-1/#comment-6241 Nat Papovich Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:57:08 +0000 http://www.webapper.com/blog/?p=997#comment-6241 Scott - yes FogBugz has a much smaller featureset than OnTime. And we actually used many of those features in OnTime like workflow-specific templates, the client portal, and customizable workflows. We switched mainly to give FogBugz a try, and it suits us well enough. Not perfectly, but then neither did OnTime. Ultimately, we'd like to -gasp- build our own, but we haven't done it yet. For a company like ours, task and ticket management can be a strategic advantage. Scott – yes FogBugz has a much smaller featureset than OnTime. And we actually used many of those features in OnTime like workflow-specific templates, the client portal, and customizable workflows. We switched mainly to give FogBugz a try, and it suits us well enough. Not perfectly, but then neither did OnTime. Ultimately, we’d like to -gasp- build our own, but we haven’t done it yet. For a company like ours, task and ticket management can be a strategic advantage.

]]> By: Scott Vickery http://www.webapper.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/26/axosoft-ontime-to-subversion-svn-hooks-via-tortoisesvn/comment-page-1/#comment-5433 Scott Vickery Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:31:06 +0000 http://www.webapper.com/blog/?p=997#comment-5433 Out of curiosity, why did you switch from OnTime to FogBugz? FogBugz seems to lack a lot of functionality in comparison to OnTime. Out of curiosity, why did you switch from OnTime to FogBugz? FogBugz seems to lack a lot of functionality in comparison to OnTime.

]]> By: Brandon Behrens http://www.webapper.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/26/axosoft-ontime-to-subversion-svn-hooks-via-tortoisesvn/comment-page-1/#comment-2084 Brandon Behrens Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:05:28 +0000 http://www.webapper.com/blog/?p=997#comment-2084 I think you can get around hacking the primary keys by a simple naming convention. Prefix defects with d, features with f, tasks with t etc. Then in the TortoiseLinker.asp file, check the first character to find out where to redirect the user to, instead of basing it on the defect id in the querystring. While this feels kind of dirty to me as well, it's preferrable to modifying the ontime database primary key and potentially voiding my support contract. Your post was extremely helpful, Thanks. I think you can get around hacking the primary keys by a simple naming convention. Prefix defects with d, features with f, tasks with t etc. Then in the TortoiseLinker.asp file, check the first character to find out where to redirect the user to, instead of basing it on the defect id in the querystring.

While this feels kind of dirty to me as well, it’s preferrable to modifying the ontime database primary key and potentially voiding my support contract.

Your post was extremely helpful, Thanks.

]]>