Comments on: MissingFuse handler for Fusebox5 development http://www.webapper.com/blog/index.php/2006/10/12/missingfuse-handler-for-fusebox5-development/ Web Application Engineers Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:24:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/ hourly 1 By: Kevin Roche http://www.webapper.com/blog/index.php/2006/10/12/missingfuse-handler-for-fusebox5-development/comment-page-1/#comment-277 Kevin Roche Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.webapper.net/blog/index.cfm/2006/6/28/MissingFuse-handler-for-Fusebox5-development#comment-277 Nat, Congratulations on the new job. I like the idea of the missing template handler creating fuses. Just a pity it can't add the code too! Nat,

Congratulations on the new job. I like the idea of the missing template handler creating fuses. Just a pity it can’t add the code too!

]]> By: Nat Papovich http://www.webapper.com/blog/index.php/2006/10/12/missingfuse-handler-for-fusebox5-development/comment-page-1/#comment-278 Nat Papovich Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.webapper.net/blog/index.cfm/2006/6/28/MissingFuse-handler-for-Fusebox5-development#comment-278 Hi Kevin - Are you coming to MAX? I'll be there. I spent weeks and weeks trying to make the error template write the correct code. I tried inferring the purpose from the fuse name, looking into application-scoped factories for matching names, introspecting method names, peering at the attributes scope, correlating the fuse position in the circuit hierarchy. But then I gave up. No I didn't. Just kidding. But wouldn't that be cool?! Hi Kevin – Are you coming to MAX? I’ll be there. I spent weeks and weeks trying to make the error template write the correct code. I tried inferring the purpose from the fuse name, looking into application-scoped factories for matching names, introspecting method names, peering at the attributes scope, correlating the fuse position in the circuit hierarchy. But then I gave up.

No I didn’t. Just kidding. But wouldn’t that be cool?!

]]>